The trade deadline is mostly about rental players, but we do get the odd hockey deal.
As one NHL player agent opined to me Monday, he thinks this offseason will be much busier than what we get before Friday’s 3 p.m. Eastern deadline, especially with the salary cap finally going up for real this summer, creating more flexibility for teams. Draft week in Vegas could be fireworks in late June.
Having said that, we do have some intriguing non-rentals on the market this week. That doesn’t necessarily mean they’ll move, but their respective teams are listening.
Here’s what I’m hearing.
This feels like a situation where Blues general manager Doug Armstrong doesn’t need to move off a high price, and if no one offers one, he can decide whether he wants to revisit it this summer. But I don’t think Armstrong thinks he needs to reduce the price one bit this week for a very productive player who he’s just as happy to keep.
That said, the fishing line and hook are definitely in the water. Colleague Chris Johnston has reported the cost is at least what the Calgary Flames got in dealing Elias Lindholm to the Vancouver Canucks, which was a package of a first-round pick, two prospects and an NHL player.
Buchnevich is signed through next season at a $5.8 million average annual value. The Blues would probably need to retain, and I think they are willing to do so. I just don’t know why contending teams like the Edmonton Oilers or Vegas Golden Knights that are seeking a top-six forward will need to pay this kind of price when they can get rentals for less. The sense I have as of now is teams view the price as too rich.
New, for @TheAthletic: A look at the top-50 NHL trade targets as the final sprint towards Friday's deadline arrives.
It's the Big Board.https://t.co/z3B1cRBNi8https://t.co/z3B1cRBNi8
— Chris Johnston (@reporterchris) March 4, 2024
TSN colleague Darren Dreger reported Monday that action was picking up on the 25-year-old defenseman, who is signed through next season at a $4.6 million AAV.
The appeal for a playoff contender is getting two playoff runs out of him. Depending on the acquisition price, would those teams rather pay for two playoff runs with Chychrun or rent out pending unrestricted free agent Noah Hanifin from Calgary for one? Hanifin is obviously having a better season.
As of Monday, the Senators have not set a specific price point in conversations with teams. They are still in listening mode. This feels like a situation that hasn’t reached its next gear in talks, and having Hanifin out there probably doesn’t help. Ottawa can also afford to wait for the offseason.
Vatrano is signed through next season at a reasonable $3.65 million AAV. That’s very reasonable given his career offensive season, and it’s no guarantee the Ducks are fully committed to moving him. But given where the Ducks are roster-wise in their rebuild, they’re obviously listening and have been for a while.
A reunion with the New York Rangers, his previous NHL stop, makes the most sense to me. And I believe the Carolina Hurricanes are keeping tabs on the situation, too. Carolina prefers not to spend big on rentals, so Vatrano would fit its criteria, and the Hurricanes are looking for an upgrade up front.
The Devils remain interested, as of Monday, and the Flames remain noncommittal about moving their star goalie, who is signed through the 2025-26 season at a $6 million AAV. Because the Flames keep winning!
New Jersey is motivated to fix its goaltending once and for all, and as I reported last Friday, the Devils have told the Flames they’re ready to take on the contract without any salary retention. But Flames GM Craig Conroy worries about ripping the heart out of his dressing room if he moves his goalie.
Most likely this is an offseason decision, but because the Devils are eager now, don’t discount the possibility of a trade before Friday’s deadline. Markstrom has a full no-move clause, but it’s believed he would waive it for New Jersey.
It was interesting to read in colleague Fluto Shinzawa’s piece last week why the Bruins could be willing to move last year’s Vezina Trophy winner, which would gain them cap flexibility to address lineup needs up front and on the blue line. You certainly understand the logic behind it.
But the reality, too, is that in-season goalie trades are so rare and especially hard to pull off for proper value. Edmonton and Carolina are no longer looking for goalie help and overall the demand on the goalie market has shrunk.
Yes, the Devils desperately need a goalie, and as discussed above they’re focused on a different Swede as their top target. However, I was also told Monday that the Devils have looked at Ullmark as a possible option if they can’t swing a deal with Calgary. So stay tuned there. Perhaps Ullmark, who’s signed through next season at a $5 million AAV, ends up in New Jersey if Calgary won’t move Markstrom.
‘That’s a big list’: Cam Neely on trade needs and the challenges of acquiring them. https://t.co/6qsYlktO8f
— Fluto Shinzawa (@FlutoShinzawa) February 26, 2024
It was status quo on the Allen trade front Monday, I was told, and given the shrinking demand on the goalie market, that’s not surprising. Habs GM Kent Hughes said on the Got Yer Back podcast a few weeks ago that he’s fine waiting until the summer to figure it out — that this trade deadline wasn’t a must as far as unclogging his three-goalie situation.
In fact, my understanding is that a few teams have indicated to the Canadiens that they’re more interested in talking trade on Allen after the season when he has one year left on his contract at a $3.85 million AAV. It doesn’t mean he won’t before Friday’s deadline, but the Canadiens are ready to hold him if need be.
Playing top-line minutes, albeit in San Jose, the 32-year-old has had a bounce-back season. He’s signed through next season at a $5 million AAV, which is too rich for most contenders but given how thin the center market is, he’s attracted some interest.
The Sharks have only one salary retention spot left because they’re already retaining money on Brent Burns and Erik Karlsson, so it probably doesn’t make sense to tie up their last retention spot through next season, though a league source said Monday that San Jose was open to anything in trying to be creative in a Granlund trade. The Sharks could certainly take another contract back to facilitate a trade.
As of Monday, it felt like Granlund’s cap hit for next year was an issue for some teams looking at him. Let’s see if the Sharks can find a way around it. At a reduced cap hit, I think Granlund is an under-the-radar pickup.
(Top photo of Pavel Buchnevich and Elias Lindholm battling in front of Jacob Markstrom: Sergei Belski / USA Today)
https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiXGh0dHBzOi8vdGhlYXRobGV0aWMuY29tLzUzMTU3NTgvMjAyNC8wMy8wNC9uaGwtdHJhZGUtcnVtYmxpbmdzLWJ1Y2huZXZpY2gtbWFya3N0cm9tLXVsbG1hcmsv0gEA?oc=5
2024-03-04 19:04:11Z
CBMiXGh0dHBzOi8vdGhlYXRobGV0aWMuY29tLzUzMTU3NTgvMjAyNC8wMy8wNC9uaGwtdHJhZGUtcnVtYmxpbmdzLWJ1Y2huZXZpY2gtbWFya3N0cm9tLXVsbG1hcmsv0gEA
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar