Sabtu, 28 November 2020

Rogers Centre, formerly SkyDome, aka SexDome, may be umm, going down - Deadspin

Sanitizer sounds like a good idea if you’re staying in a Rogers Centre hotel room.
Sanitizer sounds like a good idea if you’re staying in a Rogers Centre hotel room.
Image: (Getty Images)

The end of the Rogers Centre is nigh, according to a report in the Toronto Globe and Mail as Rogers Communications is in negotiations to demolish the 31-year-old stadium and build a new one.

Advertisement

The stadium, which opened in 1989, was built as a modern update to the multi-purpose, AstroTurf stadiums of the 1970s. It soon seemed antiquated as the opening of Oriole Park at Camden Yards in 1992 led to a wave of retro, natural grass stadiums being built. SkyDome was the first park to have a fully functional retractable roof (Montreal’s Olympic Stadium also was built with a retractable roof, but, umm, it had ... issues), and Mike Lupica once derisively referred to the place as “Disneyland.”

Skydome also featured a Hard Rock hotel in the stadium, which led to it being the only baseball stadium where fans and players could simultaneously circle the bases.

Advertisement

SkyDome featured one of baseball’s most dramatic home runs – Joe Carter’s series-winning blast in 1993 off Mitch Williams. But before that, two fans were seen doing the nasty.

From a 1990 UPI report:

Some baseball fans think the Toronto Blue Jays’ retractable roof SkyDome home should be renamed SexDome after fans watched a couple make love in a hotel suite that overlooks the playing field.Tuesday night, during the team’s 4-3 loss to the Seattle Mariners, those with binoculars could see an older man and a buxom, blond woman having sex in their suite. Although the lights in the suite were off, the couple’s room was illuminated by a bank of television lights in the SkyDome.

The incident Tuesday follows one several weeks ago where a male guest in the hotel, built into the SkyDome itself, masturbated in the window of his suite in front of thousands of Blue Jays fans.

That was not the end of the live sex shows at the SkyDome, renamed the Rogers Centre in 2005. In 1996, during a Blue Jays-Red Sox game, 31,000 fans were treated to what was described as a 30-minute sex show.

Advertisement

“It’s a good thing they finished before the game ended or I don’t think anyone would have seen the game,” Blue Jays first base coach Alfredo Griffin said.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiVGh0dHBzOi8vZGVhZHNwaW4uY29tL3JvZ2Vycy1jZW50cmUtZm9ybWVybHktc2t5ZG9tZS1ha2Etc2V4ZG9tZS1tYXktYmUtdW0tMTg0NTc2ODA0MdIBWGh0dHBzOi8vZGVhZHNwaW4uY29tL3JvZ2Vycy1jZW50cmUtZm9ybWVybHktc2t5ZG9tZS1ha2Etc2V4ZG9tZS1tYXktYmUtdW0tMTg0NTc2ODA0MS9hbXA?oc=5

2020-11-28 14:28:00Z
52781210709771

50-something Mike Tyson, Roy Jones Jr. hungry to fight again - CTV News

LOS ANGELES -- Mike Tyson stepped onto a spotlighted stage Friday and weighed in at 220 pounds, ripping off his shirt to reveal a muscled torso that could belong to an athlete of half his 54 years.

The former heavyweight champion moved into a COVID-protective glass box and went nose-to-nose with Roy Jones Jr., once the most talented fighter in the world. Jones' 210-pound frame was slightly less toned, but still clearly in better condition than most of his fellow 51-year-olds.

These two boxing greats are older, calmer men now, but they're returning to the ring Saturday night intending to recapture a moment of their brilliant past -- and they've both worked very hard to make sure they won't be embarrassed in this extraordinary boxing exhibition.

"This is the fun part," said Tyson, who will fight for the first time in 15 years. "Everything else to get here was hell."

Their fight at Staples Center is an eight-round sparring session of sorts. It will have two-minute rounds, no official judging and limited violence, although the limit depends on whether you're asking the California State Athletic Commission or the fighters, who both intend to let their hands go.

"Maybe I don't know how to go easy," Tyson said. "I don't know. I don't want to say the wrong thing. I don't want the commission mad at me."

But for Tyson and Jones, this unique pay-per-view show is less of a sporting event and more of a chance for two transcendent athletes to prove age is a number -- and aging is a choice.

"I don't look at life as age," Tyson said. "I look at life as energy. You don't bring your age to the table. You bring your energy to the table. You don't go meet people: `Hey, I'm Bob. I'm 59.' You don't do that."

Tyson still seems surprised by the wave of events that carried him back to the ring. He admits the younger Tyson never would have believed he would be a middle-aged husband and father who needed to lose 100 pounds two years ago, because that headstrong kid from Brooklyn had never thought that far ahead.

"I didn't even think I would live this long," he said. "I was just so intense, and just took myself so serious."

Tyson got back into shape at the urging of his wife, who got him to start doing 15 minutes a day on the treadmill. The 15 minutes turned into two hours, and then expanded to biking, running and eventually punching, along with the adoption of a vegan diet.

"Never eat anything," he said with a laugh. "Just starve and exercise."

The momentum started when he posted video of a training session on social media early in the coronavirus pandemic, and his crisp, powerful punches led to millions of impressions and a subsequent stream of increasingly lucrative comeback offers, along with the chance to raise money for charities.

"This is a part of my life that I had pretty much thrown away," Tyson said. "My last fight, I didn't have any interest in doing it. I'm interested in doing it now."

Tyson is referring to his loss to journeyman Kevin McBride in 2005, when he finally wrapped up his singular career in ugly fashion. He became the heavyweight champion at 20 and reigned over the division for five years, but his epic downfall soured him on the sport.

"I want to do it now," Tyson said. "Most of the time I was obligated to do it from a contract perspective: `If you don't do this, we'll take everything you have, and you'll be back in Brownsville.' They were blackmailing me. It's a different perspective now."

While Tyson became an international icon for his brutish, dangerous image and numerous misbehaviours, Jones was widely revered as perhaps the most skilled boxer of his generation. Jones was a preternaturally gifted athlete who dominated his weight classes while still pursuing his passion for basketball.

Nate Robinson was a rookie guard for the Knicks in 2005 when Jones participated in a full practice with the team.

"I was freaking out," said the 36-year-old Robinson, no stranger to freakish athletic feats as a three-time winner of the NBA Slam Dunk contest at 5-foot-9. "That was one of the highlights of my life, to be able to rub shoulders and hoop with one of your favourite boxers."

Jones fought regularly throughout the 2010s, but thought he was finally retired two years ago. When he got an offer to be the opponent in Tyson's comeback, Jones couldn't resist the chance to fight a legend he never got to meet during a career spent mostly at light heavyweight.

So Jones embarked on his own comeback training regimen.

"It's been the craziest thing you ever could have imagined," Jones said. "I can't believe I'm able to maintain my speed at 51 years old. I'm still faster than 95% of the boxing world, and it shocks me. The aches and pains are there because you're 50, and they're going to be there no matter what you do. You just have to have a mental strength to overcome an adversity."

Tyson and Jones are returning to a new world of boxing fandom and consumption. This show is being promoted by Triller, a video-making app and social media platform, with a fight-night show featuring performances by several rappers, a surprisingly solid undercard and a co-main event pitting Robinson in his professional boxing debut against YouTube star Jake Paul.

Robinson and Paul both seem appropriately awed by the circumstances of their bout.

"You've got to remember, I'm 23, and this is the first time that people my age will be able to experience a Mike Tyson fight live," Paul said. "I can't believe I'm a part of it."

Neither Tyson nor Jones is likely done with boxing after this show. Jones said he hopes to fight mixed martial arts legend Anderson Silva next "if this one goes well," while Tyson will go wherever this strange trip takes him next.

"Me being here is already a success," Tyson said. "Me just existing as a human being is a success."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiYmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmN0dm5ld3MuY2Evc3BvcnRzLzUwLXNvbWV0aGluZy1taWtlLXR5c29uLXJveS1qb25lcy1qci1odW5ncnktdG8tZmlnaHQtYWdhaW4tMS41MjA4Mjg30gFBaHR0cHM6Ly9iZXRhLmN0dm5ld3MuY2EvbmF0aW9uYWwvc3BvcnRzLzIwMjAvMTEvMjcvMV81MjA4Mjg3Lmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-11-28 01:49:00Z
52781207599635

Scott Stinson: Blue Jays fans may not miss the Rogers Centre, but don't expect them to pay for replacement - National Post

Article content continued

Rogers Centre ‘s current owners bought the stadium for less than five per cent of its construction cost when it was just 15 years old. Photo by John E. Sokolowski-USA TODAY Sports

Could a similar scenario play out in Toronto? The specifics might be different but the end result the same: a big and complicated vision gets whittled down into more acceptable parts, and a lot of horse-trading ensues involving cost and land use and eventually a baseball stadium emerges at the end. Maybe it’s next to the Rogers Centre, maybe it’s somewhere else on the waterfront that is presently being imagined for better things.

The thing to remember as the process plays out is that Rogers has a baseball stadium that it already owns, and which it bought, at 15 years old, for less than five per cent of its construction cost. If it wants to replace it, that should be a project that is entirely up to Rogers management and its shareholders. The stadium gambit inevitably includes an appeal to public money to help with up-front costs, or tax breaks on the back end, or sweet land arrangements, or some combination of all three. Sure, that stuff benefits the team owners, but hey: New stadium! Outfield beer garden! Woo!

Already there are probably Blue Jays fans who are dreaming of a PNC Park North or an Oracle Park East — the lovely waterfront stadiums of Pittsburgh and San Francisco — and who would be fine if a few tax dollars went to that instead of filling potholes.

But that’s just the trap that the team owners set. Of course it would be nice if the Blue Jays replaced their fusty old dome. And if they do, the public should be willing to support it in one specific way, and one way only: by buying tickets.

• Email: sstinson@postmedia.com | Twitter:

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiiQFodHRwczovL25hdGlvbmFscG9zdC5jb20vc3BvcnRzL3Njb3R0LXN0aW5zb24tYmx1ZS1qYXlzLWZhbnMtbWF5LW5vdC1taXNzLXRoZS1yb2dlcnMtY2VudHJlLWJ1dC1kb250LWV4cGVjdC10aGVtLXRvLXBheS1mb3ItYS1yZXBsYWNlbWVudNIBtwFodHRwczovL25hdGlvbmFscG9zdC5jb20vc3BvcnRzL3Njb3R0LXN0aW5zb24tYmx1ZS1qYXlzLWZhbnMtbWF5LW5vdC1taXNzLXRoZS1yb2dlcnMtY2VudHJlLWJ1dC1kb250LWV4cGVjdC10aGVtLXRvLXBheS1mb3ItYS1yZXBsYWNlbWVudC93Y20vMjA3MmRiNDItYWY4OC00MGNiLTg5OGUtZTZlMTI3MDcxMDFlL2FtcC8?oc=5

2020-11-28 01:15:32Z
52781210709771

Best moments from Phil Mickelson and Charles Barkley's win at The Match - Golf Channel

Score one for the underdogs!

Phil Mickelson and Charles Barkley entered the latest iteration of The Match, The Match III, as betting underdogs to favorites Stephen Curry and Peyton Manning. However, Mickelson and the 25-handicap Barkley got the job done in convincing fashion, winning 4 and 3 on Friday at Stone Canyon Club in Oro Valley, Arizona.

"Two people thought this was going to happen: you and me," Mickelson told Barkley as they walked off the 15th green.

After dropping the first hole, Mickelson and Barkley won four straight holes to take command. As Curry struggled with his game and Manning couldn't do much to pick up the slack, the two went 4 down after 10 holes. In total, they won just three holes.

While there were still plenty of Classic Chuck shots to make things entertaining, Mickelson performed well as a player, coach and caddie to headline a strong team performance.

Oh, and the banter wasn't "turrible," either.

Here are some of the most memorable moments from the day:


To: Chuck, From: Tiger

Barkley's golf ability and knack for self deprecation make him an easy target, so it's no surprise that Tiger Woods' needle found him.

Woods sent some gifts Barkley's way before the match, including a reflective vest and airhorn.

The joke, though, was mostly on Tiger. Barkley didn't need any of his presents early. He hit a nice baby draw off the first tee and didn't miss a fairway until the fifth hole. And while Barkley did hit some foul balls later, the match was well in hand by then.


Early over-club

Mickelson put on his caddie hat right away after bombing a drive into the left rough at the opening hole. As Barkley sized up a wedge shot, Mickelson shot the flag with his rangefinder.

“70 yards,” Mickelson said.

Barkley clipped it a little thin, sending the ball well over the flag and rolling it onto the back fringe, some 80 feet away from the flag.

Mickelson then conceded that he over-clubbed Barkley on purpose.

“It was actually 55,” he said to Barkley. “I didn’t want to tell you that because I wanted you to be aggressive. … I’ve underestimated your ability.”



Pray for the zebras?

Steph Curry was easily the best dressed player on the course, and Phil Mickelson agreed: "I think he looks amazing.”

But Andre Iguodala, one of Curry's former Warriors teammates who was part of the broadcast team, disagreed.

"How many zebras had to die for you to look fly?" Iguodala quipped.

Ouch.


Barkley's Gary Player story

Speaking of outfits, Barkley's all-black attire prompted a tweet from Gary Player.

"Glad to see that Chuck has channeled his inner Black Knight with his all black attire today," Player said. "Let’s go Chuck & Phil."

Barkley then mentioned that he and Player teed it up recently.

"One of the highlights of my life was getting to meet Gary Player about six weeks ago," Barkley said. "I always wanted to meet him, we played a great round of golf and it was an honor and a privilege."

Unsurprisingly, Player made some comments about Barkley's weight during their round together.

"I'll tell you what, he made me feel bad about being fat, though," Barkley said. "He told me I need to get in the gym."


Barkley's hecklers

Tiger and Gary weren't the only ones making fun at Barkley's expense. Barkley's "NBA on TNT" colleagues – Ernie Johnson, Kenny Smith and Shaquille O'Neal – joined the telecast from their homes.

"I've got $100,000 on Steph Curry," O'Neal said to Barkley, who chunked his tee ball at the sixth hole amid the trash talk.

Finally, Mickelson had enough.

"I’m tired of your colleagues disrespecting you," he said before handing a dozen Callaway golf balls with Shaq's face logoed on them to Barkley. 

Barkley's next shot from the drop zone missed the green, as well.

"200,000 on Steph Curry," O'Neal added.

"Where’s the hitch?" Kenny Smith asked Barkley as he walked toward the green.

O'Neal then had the best zinger of them all as Barkley lined up a birdie putt off of Mickelson's tee shot.

"Chuck, if you can't read words how you gonna read greens?" O'Neal asked.

Mickelson's advice – "Quiet your mind, my friend" – paid off, though, as Barkley nestled one close to clinch the halve after Manning lipped out a short birdie try.



‘Strong, cocky move’

With Barkley facing a long birdie putt from the fringe at the fifth hole, Curry had a chance to chip he and Manning's fourth shot close and put some pressure on.

However, he duffed it.

With the ball still in the rough, Mickelson decided to conceded the bogey to his opponents.

"That’s a strong, cocky move right there," he said to Barkley, who ended up lagging one 4 feet past and setting up a Mickelson par make for the hole.



'I bought it'

Who said the Super Bowl had the best commercials?



Chuckopotamus

Here's the ball flight we're used to out of Chuck. Warning: It's not for the shank of heart.



'Sorry'

After Barkley declared the match basically over with he and Mickelson leading 3 up at the turn, the pair went 4 up after 10 holes. But Curry and Manning managed to get one back at the par-4 11th hole as Mickelson and Barkley spent some quality time in the desert.

Nice out by Mickelson, even if Barkley would later miss a putt for double bogey.

As for Barkley's club toss? In Chuck's words: Turrible!


Great – but meaningless – shot!

Not much went right for Curry and Manning on Friday.

Even this beauty of a bunker shot by Steph, at No. 12,  resulted in a lost hole.

Great shot, but Curry still might not want to check his Twitter for a while. Better to let the plus-1 handicap skepticism die down first.


Block or charge?

Well...?



And the winning putt...

Mickelson sealed the deal with this birdie make, but man, wouldn't it have been great if Barkley had drained the game-winner instead?

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiW2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmdvbGZjaGFubmVsLmNvbS9uZXdzL2Jlc3QtbW9tZW50cy1waGlsLW1pY2tlbHNvbi1hbmQtY2hhcmxlcy1iYXJrbGV5cy13aW4tbWF0Y2jSAQA?oc=5

2020-11-28 00:17:38Z
52781201854251

Jumat, 27 November 2020

Blue Jays off-season FAQ: Rogers Centre replacement far from a done deal - Sportsnet.ca

TORONTO – The Toronto Blue Jays are turning out to be a team of intrigue this off-season for more than just what they’re trying to accomplish with their roster.

As they continue to be connected to every available player of consequence – “They are being very flirty,” is how one agent put it – a story by the Globe and Mail’s Andrew Willis on Friday revealed team owner Rogers Communications Inc. is looking to build a new stadium, rather than renovate the 31-year-old Rogers Centre, as part of a wider property redevelopment.

The part about creating a sports-anchored real-estate project – a business model for team owners that’s becoming the industry’s new regional sports network – is not brand new. Discussions on that front have been ongoing for the past few years.

What is intriguing about Willis’ piece is that the thinking within Rogers (which also owns this website) and project partner Brookfield Asset Management Inc. seems to have settled around tearing down the dome to build a new stadium, rather than trying to refurbish it.

The possibility immediately sparked excitement, but a statement from Rogers sought to tamp expectations: “Prior to the pandemic, we were exploring options for the stadium but through this year our primary focus has been keeping our customers connected and employees safe, so there is no update on the Rogers Centre to share at this time.”

So, what’s up with all that? Oh, and like George Springer, D.J. LeMahieu, J.T. Realmuto, Michael Brantley, Francisco Lindor and all that fun stuff? Good time for a wide-ranging Blue Jays FAQ:

So, the Blue Jays are getting a new stadium then?

Definitely Maybe is the name of an old Oasis album and also an apt description of the situation.

Two of the people I spoke with today insisted that there was nothing new here, that this file has been largely dormant since last fall. A check of the City of Toronto’s lobbyist registry supports that, as there’s been no documented meeting since Oct. 17, 2019 when a staff member for Councillor Joe Cressy, whose ward includes the dome site, spoke with Jodi Parps, Rogers’ manager of government relations, provincial and municipal. That followed a bigger meeting July 10, 2019 that included Cressy, two staff members, Edward Rogers, the RCI chairman, Tony Staffieri, RCI’s chief financial officer, Parps, Blue Jays president and CEO Mark Shapiro and Ben Colabrese, the club’s executive vice-president, finance.

The discussions centred around the dome’s future, the surrounding area and the city’s relevant leaseholds. COVID-19 arrested the progress, but that doesn’t mean the entire project stopped. Modelling for the project likely continued between Rogers and Brookfield during that time, and they likely settled on a vision for the site, floated in broad strokes in the piece by the well-connected Willis.

Beyond what he outlined, the project is expected to entail some building out of the Rail Deck Park idea that’s circulated for years. That would create more greenspace that can be used year-round and will be an important piece of the entire plan.

Makes sense. It’s done then?

Far from. All three levels of government have a piece of this, each will need to be satisfied, and it’s complicated.

While Rogers owns the stadium, the land beneath it belongs to Canada Lands Company, a crown corporation which issued a 99-year lease that runs through 2088 and is zoned for stadium usage only. That’s a primary reason why the building sold for only $25 million in 2004 – how many companies in the city need a domed stadium? Right, one.

A plan of the nature being discussed would require substantial rezoning. In the process of examining a renovation, the sports-anchored development trend began taking hold, and a series of interests began to align, turning it into a much bigger project. In a statement Friday, Cressy said he’s ready to re-engage, underlining the city’s interests in the venture:

Other partners would likely be needed to pull everything off, too, especially the recreational and public-space components. Bottom line, a lot of elements still need to fall into place, so don’t expect shovels in the ground any time soon.

Cool, cool, cool. But what would happen to the Blue Jays if they demolished the Rogers Centre?

Before you start mapping out the drive to Buffalo or prepping your liver for a couple of seasons in Montreal, remember what the St. Louis Cardinals did when they went from old Busch Stadium to new Busch Stadium, which opened in 2006. The Cardinals broke ground on the new place on Jan. 17, 2004 and spent the next two years building the guts of the new park before razing the old one to finish things up. This photo essay from the St. Louis Post Dispatch nicely illustrates the process of what turned out to be a seamless transition.

The Rogers Centre footprint is tighter, but there’s some land to the south of the building, as well as some on the west side, and a bit less on the east that could be used in a similar process. That’s a possibility that has been raised, according to multiple sources, with the aim of ensuring the Blue Jays aren’t left homeless, even if briefly.

Phew, that’s a lot to digest. Exciting as all that is, what’s happening with getting this team more players?

Work continues on that front, and boy is what I’m hearing interesting. To build on the analogy made by the agent who said the Blue Jays are being flirty, it sounds like they’re legitimately trying to put some rings on it, too. D.J. LeMahieu was described to me as “the perfect fit” and that he didn’t immediately re-sign with the New York Yankees suggests he’s seriously considering his options in more than a cursory way. The New York Mets, under new owner Steve Cohen, are probably gumming things up there after making it clear they’re in it to win it on multiple fronts. While the Blue Jays may be willing to set the market, agents will probably want to wait for the Mets to drop the gauntlet.

That impacts the market for another Blue Jays target in George Springer, with whom they’ve progressed beyond just talking. Same thing with Michael Brantley, but while his left-handed bat and offensive profile are perfect for the batting order, how he fits defensively is less seamless. Since he’s limited to left field and DH, that means pushing Lourdes Gurriel Jr. out of a spot in which he just started settling in. The Blue Jays don’t mind creating redundancies – good luck keeping everyone happy, Charlie Montoyo! – but that also creates surplus to trade.

Speaking of surplus, what’s going on at catcher and the report on J.T. Realmuto? Don’t they have a bazillion catchers already?

Craig Mish, who does a fine job covering the Miami Marlins, dropped this tidbit earlier in the week:

Intriguing, and not entirely surprising, as the Blue Jays also checked in on Yasmani Grandal last winter, even if they do have enviable depth behind the plate (bazillion might be a bit hyperbolic). Certainly they hope that one of Danny Jansen, Alejandro Kirk, Gabriel Moreno, Riley Adams and Reese McGuire eventually becomes an impact backstop like Realmuto. But if they want to advance their program, well, Realmuto is an all-star right now.

People are being really quiet and guarded around this chatter, which lends credence to Mish’s tweet. Such a move would be reminiscent of the Blue Jays signing Russell Martin to an $82-million, five-year deal ahead of the 2015 season to push the team forward. Adding a sixth catcher to the 40-man now would definitely be suboptimal, but again, surplus creates opportunities to trade and they could use some of their young catching to get pitching help.

What about pitching? Are they done at re-signing Robbie Ray?

No. The Blue Jays need someone who can win a playoff game for the rotation if they’re going to be for real.

Trevor Bauer is the obvious big ticket, but right now they seem more fixated on position players than pitchers. Not to get repetitive, but my sense is they’d like to nail down their lineup adds, figure out what’s staying, and then trade to get pitching help. They must feel like some teams will need to off-load arms eventually (Texas with Lance Lynn, or Cincinnati with Sonny Gray, perhaps).

The Asian market is another opportunity here, with right-handers Tomoyuki Sugano of the Yomiuri Giants and Kohei Arihara of the Hokkaido Nippon Ham Fighters to be posted. The signing of Shun Yamaguchi last off-season was done partly to build a bridge into the Japanese market, with an eye towards the class of players available this winter. Sugano and Arihara are both intriguing, but the real prize could be Kodai Senga of the Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks, if he’s posted.

Lastly, what about Francisco Lindor?

I’ve had several people tell me that the Blue Jays really want him. Well, duh. Who wouldn’t? As perfect as LeMahieu is for them, Lindor is even more perfect, even if he pushes Bo Bichette off of short. This one is complicated, though, both because of the acquisition cost in trade, but also with his pending free agency. The ongoing lack of clarity about what it would take to re-sign him is a big yellow light here and my sense is the Blue Jays won’t meet Cleveland’s price without knowing if they can extend him.

Maybe that forces the acquisition cost for Lindor down, but Cleveland could also wait for the impact free agents to sign and then work with any teams left on the sidelines.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNwb3J0c25ldC5jYS9tbGIvYXJ0aWNsZS9ibHVlLWpheXMtb2ZmLXNlYXNvbi1mYXEtcm9nZXJzLWNlbnRyZS1yZXBsYWNlbWVudC1mYXItZG9uZS1kZWFsL9IBZWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNwb3J0c25ldC5jYS9tbGIvYmx1ZS1qYXlzLW9mZi1zZWFzb24tZmFxLXJvZ2Vycy1jZW50cmUtcmVwbGFjZW1lbnQtZmFyLWRvbmUtZGVhbC9zbi1hbXAv?oc=5

2020-11-28 00:02:00Z
CBMiZmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNwb3J0c25ldC5jYS9tbGIvYXJ0aWNsZS9ibHVlLWpheXMtb2ZmLXNlYXNvbi1mYXEtcm9nZXJzLWNlbnRyZS1yZXBsYWNlbWVudC1mYXItZG9uZS1kZWFsL9IBZWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNwb3J0c25ldC5jYS9tbGIvYmx1ZS1qYXlzLW9mZi1zZWFzb24tZmFxLXJvZ2Vycy1jZW50cmUtcmVwbGFjZW1lbnQtZmFyLWRvbmUtZGVhbC9zbi1hbXAv

The Blue Jays might get a brand new ballpark to replace the Rogers Centre down the road. Fans can dream a little - Toronto Star

Reports of a plan to tear down the Rogers Centre have Blue Jays fans dreaming of a more intimate, scenic, well-stocked ballpark in its place.

But the owners of the 31-year-old stadium say an overhaul of any kind will have to wait.

“Prior to the pandemic, we were exploring options for the stadium but through this year our primary focus has been keeping our customers connected and keeping our employees safe, so there is no update on the Rogers Centre to share at this time,” Rogers spokesperson Andrew Garas said Friday.

The statement came after the Globe and Mail reported Rogers and real estate giant Brookfield Asset Management Inc. were looking to knock down the stadium as part of a larger development project.

Citing unnamed sources, the Globe reported that two companies would build a new stadium half the size on the southern part of the current site and use the remaining land for residential towers, office buildings, stores and public space. Building a new stadium on the lakefront if the initial plan falls through is also an option, the report said. Brookfield declined to comment on the matter.

Rogers owns the stadium but not the land it sits on, which is leased from the Canada Lands Company through 2088 and zoned for stadium use only, Sportsnet reported in 2018.

The City of Toronto said a formal planning application has not been submitted to redevelop the Rogers Centre, while a spokesperson for Mayor John Tory said neither he nor his office staff are involved in any discussions on the subject. Tory told city council and staff last year that he would not take part in any talks about the stadium’s future because he remains on the Rogers family trust after a previous role as a chief executive with the company.

Lobbying records show the most recent registered activity regarding the Rogers Centre came in the form of a meeting with councillor Joe Cressy, who represents Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York where the stadium is located, in July 2019 and an October 2019 meeting with Cressy’s staff.

Cressy told the Star last August that he accepted an invitation in July to meet with officials from the Blue Jays, Rogers and Brookfield to chat “in broad terms” about their plans for the domed ballpark.

At the time, Cressy said having a redeveloped stadium on the existing lands would be an important anchor for downtown and the city as a whole, and that any refurbishment must be done with private money. The group Cressy met with didn’t have a proposal to share at the time, he said.

Cressy has not heard anything further since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“If there is any ambition for a broader land revitalization, we need to work to together to ensure it adheres to good planning principles and a good public process,” he said in a statement Friday.

If and when Rogers, Brookfield and the Jays are ready to restart the discussions, Cressy said, he will ensure there is a “clear understanding that public dollars are not to be used to pay for a revitalized stadium.”

Rogers said Friday that any redevelopment project would be funded privately.

Downtown Toronto city councillor Mike Layton said he does not know details of the reported plan, but agreed that no more public money should go into the site or a new stadium.

“We’ve paid enough,” Layton (Ward 11 University-Rosedale) said in an interview Friday.

Then-Metro Council and the Ontario government were originally on the hook for a combined $60 million of the initial $225-million price tag, but ended up paying a total of $350 million after the stadium’s cost ballooned to almost $600 million.

The stadium is not in his ward, but Layton sits on the Toronto-East York community council likely to receive any redevelopment proposal before it goes to full city council.

“We paid a lot of money to build that (SkyDome) and then it was sold for $25 million. I don’t know the proposal, so I wouldn’t endeavour to give a hard ‘No’ now on whatever they want to do with the site,” he said, “but I hope we don’t see any more tax dollars going for a stadium that should be going for transit, affordable housing and parks for residents — not just a handful of major leaguers.”

Layton, who has led council’s response to climate change, also questioned any plan to demolish the current stadium, saying a tenet of carbon reduction is reusing existing infrastructure rather destroying, dumping and building anew.

Longtime sports industry executive Richard Peddie, president of the Rogers Centre between 1989 and 1994, said the idea of building a new stadium on the existing parcel of land simply isn’t practical.

“There’s no way you could do it on the same site, because it would mean the team needing to play somewhere else for three or four years. You’d need to keep this open while you built somewhere else,” said Peddie. “... There’s got to be natural grass. It should be an open air stadium which you can cover up, rather than a domed stadium where you can roll the roof back. It should be smaller. And wearing my progressive hat, there shouldn’t be money from any level of government going towards this.”

Loading...

Loading...Loading...Loading...Loading...Loading...

The Rogers Centre landed at No. 27 out of 30 in Ballpark Digest’s ranking of MLB stadiums this past July. Changes to the stadium no longer falls under Jays president Mark Shapiro’s purview, with Rogers now leading the file, but he told the Star in February, before the pandemic hit, that there may be more upgrades to announce in 2021.

“A lot of time, a lot of energy and a lot of focus from people — both within our ownership and even a couple of people within our building — continue to be spent exploring the next steps for a much bigger plan,” he said. “It is incredibly complex, and I think that’ll be clear once it’s announced, and so that’s why it’s taken so long.”

With files from Gregor Chisholm, Tess Kalinowski, Josh Rubin and The Canadian Press

Laura Armstrong

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

Q:

What do you think of the idea of replacing the Rogers Centre? Leave your thoughts below.

Conversations are opinions of our readers and are subject to the Code of Conduct. The Star does not endorse these opinions.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__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?oc=5

2020-11-27 23:22:12Z
52781210709771

Stadium reno or replacement logical next step in Blue Jays' evolution as franchise - TSN

Columnist image

TORONTO — When Mark Shapiro talks of building a sustainable winner, most of us think about the team on the field and a roster filled with in-their-prime players competing for AL East titles on a year-in, year-out basis.

But there’s much more to the Shapiro regime’s philosophy of sustainability, and the key project all along for the 53-year-old executive has been the venue his Blue Jays call home.

While Shapiro’s Blue Jays legacy will ultimately have a lot to do with how the baseball team performs on the field, he could have a hand in changing the Toronto skyline if the club’s vision for a new — or immensely improved — stadium comes to fruition.

A Rogers Centre renovation project has been talked about on and off since Shapiro arrived in 2015.

There have been batting-cage whispers ranging from large-scale renovations — think blowing up half the building and redoing most of it — to brand new lakefront plots of land to extensive cosmetic and fan-friendly changes to the existing bones of what was formerly known as SkyDome.

Publicly, Shapiro has hinted at both when asked and he has not been shy about the need for stadium upgrades, despite declining to go into specifics of what those could ultimately look like.

After a quiet period of more than a year as the team focused on renovating its Dunedin complex and other smaller-scale restructuring, a Globe and Mail report Friday says a plan in conjunction with Brookfield Asset Management Inc. to demolish Rogers Centre as part of a privately funded multibillion-dollar redevelopment has been talked about.

According to the Globe’s Andrew Willis, citing anonymous sources, the plan would see a stadium project sit at the south end of the current site, with residential towers, office buildings, stores and public space to the north.

If plans fall through, a contingency includes building a new stadium on a different plot of lakefront land.

The project to demolish Rogers Centre and build a new stadium would have a five-to-eight-year timeline, according to the Globe, and still needs "numerous" government approvals to move forward.

In other words, it’s still in the idea stage and there may be more whispers to come as public discussion begins and the Jays continue to work through their options.

There’s no questioning where Shapiro’s work is focused these days, however, as the Jays, despite the prime downtown location, have one of the worst stadium situations in Major League Baseball at 31-year-old Rogers Centre.

On the field, the Jays are in good shape, both talent-wise and in terms of the payroll, with all of the club’s bad contracts — even Troy Tulowitzki — off the books.

The club also just completed a multi-million dollar renovation to its Dunedin player development facility and spring training stadium, leaving the ballpark at home in Toronto as the next major item on Shapiro’s checklist.

Even if the timeline of when the Jays are supposed to be a contender (pretty much now) and when a new stadium would be ready (at least a half-decade from now) doesn’t necessarily match up, it’s the clear next step in the franchise’s evolution.

Potentially in the city’s skyline, too.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMibmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRzbi5jYS9zdGFkaXVtLXJlbm8tb3ItcmVwbGFjZW1lbnQtbG9naWNhbC1uZXh0LXN0ZXAtaW4tYmx1ZS1qYXlzLWV2b2x1dGlvbi1hcy1mcmFuY2hpc2UtMS4xNTU3MzU50gF2aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cudHNuLmNhL3N0YWRpdW0tcmVuby1vci1yZXBsYWNlbWVudC1sb2dpY2FsLW5leHQtc3RlcC1pbi1ibHVlLWpheXMtZXZvbHV0aW9uLWFzLWZyYW5jaGlzZS0xLjE1NTczNTk_dHNuLWFtcA?oc=5

2020-11-27 22:57:10Z
52781210709771